A complete issue · 16 pages · 1879
Puck — August 20, 1879
# Puck Magazine, August 20, 1879 This cartoon satirizes a political or public figure (likely Conkling, based on the caption) making what the magazine presents as a desperate effort. The main illustration shows two men in a confrontation near what appears to be a fortified location ("Canonchet") with water and a boat visible. One figure wields a rifle while the other strikes a defensive pose. The header references "A Midsummer-Night's Dream," suggesting the situation is fantastical or absurd. Without clearer identification of the specific political conflict being referenced, the exact nature of this "greatest effort" remains unclear, though it appears to mock a notable public figure's actions during this period.
# Analysis of Puck Magazine Page 870 This page consists primarily of editorial commentary and brief satirical items rather than illustrated cartoons. The main content includes: **"Our Chameleon Contemporary"** — a critique of the Herald newspaper's inconsistent editorial stance, particularly regarding Governor Sprague's minimal charitable contributions during wartime. Puck satirizes the Herald's shifting positions and questions its credibility. **Brief items** mock various public figures: Conkling (described as hog-like), references to scandals involving "Lettelier," and critiques of journalistic sensationalism around a robbery victim. The page demonstrates Puck's role as satirical watchdog, targeting newspaper hypocrisy and public figures' behavior. Without visible illustrations, the satire relies entirely on sharp written commentary—typical of 19th-century political magazines that combined visual and textual mockery.
# Analysis of Puck Magazine Page 371 This page contains political satire criticizing Senator Roscoe Conkling of New York. The main cartoon depicts a policeman labeled "John Brown, Policeman" who has "clubbed" someone on August 16, 1879—referencing an actual incident. The accompanying poem "SADI" mocks Conkling's response to this police brutality. The satire suggests Conkling, despite claiming to support charity and reform, failed to properly address the assault. The text criticizes him for prioritizing self-interest and political gain over justice. The left column attacks "Free Masonry," using Conkling as an example of elite hypocrisy—someone who publicly promotes virtue while privately enabling corruption. The satire's central point: Conkling's claimed "greatest effort of his life" for public service masks his actual indifference to justice for ordinary citizens.
