comicbooks.com Join Free

A complete, restored issue of Judge from 1885-05-02 — all 16 pages of color political cartoons and topical humor, free to page through at comicbooks.com.

On the cover: # Judge Magazine, May 2, 1885 The main cartoon depicts a domestic scene with caricatured figures and a grotesquely tilted house. A man appears to be restraining a woman while pointing at a dog, with a child visible on the right. The caption reads: "Pat—'Arrah, Norah! be the looks av that, if we'd had the hoodie for the Inspicktor, the shanty begad wud have been safe widout the shticks to it.'" The exaggerated Irish dialect and caricatures suggest this is an ethnic joke typical of 1880s American humor. The tilted, ramshackle house labeled with signs appears to represent poor Irish-American housing conditions. The reference to an "Inspector" and makeshift structural supports suggests commentary on tenement housing standards or building code enforcement. The "hoodie" (likely "hoodoo," meaning bad luck or curse) implies blaming supernatural forces rather than acknowledging structural inadequacy—satirizing Irish immigrants' attitudes toward poverty and housing.

🖼️ Every page has a plain-English note on what you’re looking at — the figures, the references, the point of the satire.

← Back to Judge: The Rival in Color All exhibitions

A complete issue · 16 pages · 1885

Judge — May 2, 1885

1885-05-02 · Free to read

Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 1
1 / 16
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Judge Magazine, May 2, 1885 The main cartoon depicts a domestic scene with caricatured figures and a grotesquely tilted house. A man appears to be restraining a woman while pointing at a dog, with a child visible on the right. The caption reads: "Pat—'Arrah, Norah! be the looks av that, if we'd had the hoodie for the Inspicktor, the shanty begad wud have been safe widout the shticks to it.'" The exaggerated Irish dialect and caricatures suggest this is an ethnic joke typical of 1880s American humor. The tilted, ramshackle house labeled with signs appears to represent poor Irish-American housing conditions. The reference to an "Inspector" and makeshift structural supports suggests commentary on tenement housing standards or building code enforcement. The "hoodie" (likely "hoodoo," meaning bad luck or curse) implies blaming supernatural forces rather than acknowledging structural inadequacy—satirizing Irish immigrants' attitudes toward poverty and housing.

Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 2
2 / 16
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Understanding This Page from *Judge* Magazine This page from *Judge* contains three political editorials lampooning Democratic failures and Republican/British financial superiority. **"No Scapegoat"** criticizes the punishment of builder Buddensiek (likely for a tenement collapse) as insufficient. The piece argues that corrupt city inspectors who enabled deadly construction are equally culpable—punishing one builder won't fix systemic corruption. **"Les Enfants Perdus"** uses biblical metaphor to mock Democrats. Comparing them to Israelites denied entry to the Promised Land, it suggests they've been blocked from political power (likely referencing a recent electoral loss) by their own "Moses" (appears to reference Democratic leadership refusing to unlock the "Treasury" spoils of office). **"Stamps Fight"** argues that in international conflicts, financial resources trump military prowess. It celebrates British imperial power, attributing Britain's global dominance to its banking strength (the "Old Lady of Threadneedle Street"—the Bank of England) and consistent payment of debts ("L. s. d."—pounds, shillings, pence). The page reflects Gilded Age anxieties about corruption, Democratic weakness, and Anglo-Saxon financial supremacy.

Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 3
3 / 16
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Explanation for Modern Readers This page satirizes New York City's building regulations and corruption. The cartoon critiques lax enforcement of construction standards by the Building Department. The mock "Regulations for City Builders" are absurdist rules that expose actual problems: builders can violate approved plans with impunity if they notify the Board first (Rule III); inspectors accept bribes (Rule IV); walls are built with inadequate materials like dirt and refuse instead of proper mortar (Rule VII); and poorly constructed tenement buildings are expected to collapse, with the city liable for ambulances and compensation (Rule XII). The accompanying poem about "Edrtor" (the magazine's editor) humorously shows him buying property and tools—illustrating how even respectable people get caught in this corrupt system. The satire targets systemic negligence: buildings designed to fail, with financial consequences shifted to innocent buyers and taxpayers rather than negligent builders or officials.

Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 4
4 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 5
5 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 6
6 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 7
7 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 8
8 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 9
9 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 10
10 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 11
11 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 12
12 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 13
13 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 14
14 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 15
15 / 16
Judge — May 2, 1885 — page 16
16 / 16

Browse this issue page by page

Each page has its own page — the cartoon, who’s in it, and what the satire means.

  1. Page 1 # Judge Magazine, May 2, 1885 The main cartoon depicts a domestic scene with caricatured figures and a grotesquely tilted house. A man appears to be restraining…
  2. Page 2 # Understanding This Page from *Judge* Magazine This page from *Judge* contains three political editorials lampooning Democratic failures and Republican/British…
  3. Page 3 # Explanation for Modern Readers This page satirizes New York City's building regulations and corruption. The cartoon critiques lax enforcement of construction …
  4. Page 4 View this page →
  5. Page 5 View this page →
  6. Page 6 View this page →
  7. Page 7 View this page →
  8. Page 8 View this page →
  9. Page 9 View this page →
  10. Page 10 View this page →
  11. Page 11 View this page →
  12. Page 12 View this page →
  13. Page 13 View this page →
  14. Page 14 View this page →
  15. Page 15 View this page →
  16. Page 16 View this page →