comicbooks.com Join Free

A complete, restored issue of Judge from 1933-06 — all 38 pages of color political cartoons and topical humor, free to page through at comicbooks.com.

On the cover: # Analysis This June 1933 *Judge* cover depicts surreal, grotesque creatures in a nightmarish landscape. The creatures appear to be caricatured animals or demons with exaggerated features—bulging eyes, twisted bodies—engaged in what seems chaotic activity around water or pools. Without clearer text identifying specific figures or references, the exact satirical target is unclear. However, given the 1933 date (early New Deal era), this likely comments on Roosevelt's policies or contemporary political figures through grotesque imagery—a common *Judge* technique. The nightmarish quality suggests criticism of something the cartoonist viewed as dystopian or monstrous. The surreal style and grotesque creatures are characteristic of early 1930s American political satire, but specific identification of the referenced figures or events would require additional context.

🖼️ Every page has a plain-English note on what you’re looking at — the figures, the references, the point of the satire.

← Back to Judge: The Rival in Color All exhibitions

A complete issue · 38 pages · 1933

Judge — June 1933

1933-06 · Free to read

Judge — June 1933 — page 1 of 38
1 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Analysis This June 1933 *Judge* cover depicts surreal, grotesque creatures in a nightmarish landscape. The creatures appear to be caricatured animals or demons with exaggerated features—bulging eyes, twisted bodies—engaged in what seems chaotic activity around water or pools. Without clearer text identifying specific figures or references, the exact satirical target is unclear. However, given the 1933 date (early New Deal era), this likely comments on Roosevelt's policies or contemporary political figures through grotesque imagery—a common *Judge* technique. The nightmarish quality suggests criticism of something the cartoonist viewed as dystopian or monstrous. The surreal style and grotesque creatures are characteristic of early 1930s American political satire, but specific identification of the referenced figures or events would require additional context.

Judge — June 1933 — page 2 of 38
2 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Analysis This page is primarily **advertising, not satire or cartooning**. It's a Book-of-the-Month Club promotional ad from Judge magazine, offering a free two-volume Sherlock Holmes collection (Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Memorial Edition) to new members. The right side displays **portraits of club judges/endorsers**: Heywood Broun, Christopher Morley, Dorothy Canfield, William Allen White, and Henry Seidel Canby—prominent early 20th-century literary figures who lent credibility to the club's selections. The ad uses persuasive copy emphasizing membership benefits: no obligation to buy monthly, and members receive over 50% of book value in free selections. A coupon at bottom invites readers to request club information. This is marketing material, not editorial satire.

Judge — June 1933 — page 3 of 38
3 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Analysis This page contains **advertisements only**, not editorial cartoons or satirical content. The left side advertises the **Amstel Hotel** in Amsterdam, Holland, emphasizing Dutch hospitality and offering "attractive 1933 prices." Below that is an ad for **Hotel George V** in Paris's Champs-Élysées, noting tariffs "adjusted to present conditions"—a reference to the Great Depression's economic impact. The right side advertises the **Holland America Line**, a shipping company offering weekly sailings from Plymouth (England), Boulogne-sur-Mer (France), and Rotterdam (Holland) to New York. All three ads target American travelers and reflect 1933's economic depression, with explicit mentions of reduced pricing to attract customers during financially difficult times.

Judge — June 1933 — page 4 of 38
4 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Analysis This page is primarily **advertising rather than satire or editorial cartoon**. The dominant content comprises two hotel advertisements: 1. **The Waldorf Astoria** (top) - promoting its Park Avenue location, emphasizing proximity to business districts and cultural attractions via a map graphic. 2. **Hotel St. Regis** (bottom) - advertising new reduced rates during what appears to be an economic downturn ("Economy Carries the Day"), with specific pricing for rooms. The right column contains **"You're Telling Us?"** — a recurring Judge feature showcasing witty quotations attributed to public figures (actors, politicians, judges, etc.). These are brief, humorous or pointed observations meant to satirize their subjects' personalities or public personas, though without additional context, their specific targets aren't always evident to modern readers. The page reflects 1930s American magazine formatting, mixing commercial content with light satirical commentary.

Judge — June 1933 — page 5 of 38
5 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Analysis of Judge Magazine Page (June 1928) The main cartoon depicts a woman at a telephone, apologizing for a misdial. The humor relies on a common early telephone experience: wrong numbers due to operator error or misdialing. The "Judging the News" column contains brief satirical commentary on contemporary issues: - Midwest farmers dumping milk to protest low prices - Germany's economic position post-WWI - Memory of forgotten public figures - Bankers' sentiment about golf - Non-payment issues at a golf club - The "Century of Progress" Chicago exhibition (opening 1928) - A contented Chicago teacher's perspective on the World's Fair - The back-to-farm movement gaining momentum These brief items mock various social and economic concerns of 1928 America, from agricultural crisis to leisure pursuits among the wealthy.

Judge — June 1933 — page 6 of 38
6 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Political Satire Analysis This Judge magazine page contains two distinct pieces of satire: **"To a Bank Receiver"** is a letter mocking bank receivership during what appears to be an economic crisis. The sender, J.S. Warshawsky, complains about unemployment and financial hardship while a bank receiver lounges comfortably, dictating letters and playing golf. The satire critiques the contrast between ordinary citizens suffering job loss and creditors' debt collection while bank officials enjoy leisure and perks paid for by depositors' funds. The accompanying illustration depicts a small figure confronting a menacing judge or official figure, with the caption "Sears and Roebuck sure will hear from me about this gun!" This appears to reference consumer complaint or product liability issues, though the specific incident is unclear without additional context. Both pieces target institutional power imbalances and economic injustice.

Judge — June 1933 — page 7 of 38
7 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Analysis of Judge Magazine Page This page contains humor pieces rather than political cartoons. The top section, "Revised," mocks contemporary concerns—falling snow in mountains, currency devaluation, and new cars—suggesting these are overblown worries compared to historical problems. The "Medical Note" section jokes about hypochondria: a man who complains continuously for fifteen days shouldn't worry others, especially when others face real hardship (like a farm worker already disappointed). The implied satire targets people who manufacture anxiety. The lower cartoon, captioned "Well anyhow, she brings 'em back alive," shows a reckless female driver in a sports car at night. The joke appears to criticize women drivers as dangerous, a common stereotype of the era, though the caption suggests paradoxically that safety is somehow her strength.

Judge — June 1933 — page 8 of 38
8 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# "Mistress Pepys' Journal" by Baird Leonard This satirical column mimics Samuel Pepys' famous diary, but from a female perspective observing high society. The May 1st entry mocks the author's social obligations—specifically being pressured to play bridge at afternoon gatherings despite preferring her own pursuits. The cartoon at top illustrates the tension: a servant asks "James, do you think that it's all right to put the Duchess of Wellington and the Reverend F. Page-Roberts in the same bed?"—a joke about domestic staff managing seating arrangements (literal beds or figurative social positioning) and the awkwardness of mixing social ranks. The May 2nd entry continues gossiping about society figures and their embarrassments, establishing the column as aristocratic social commentary through comedic diary format.

Judge — June 1933 — page 9 of 38
9 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# Judge Magazine - "Judge" Comic Strip This nine-panel comic depicts a judge presiding over a courtroom, with an attorney (shown below) repeatedly presenting arguments or evidence. The strip appears to satirize courtroom procedure and judicial patience. The judge's expressions shift from attentive (panels 1-2) through increasingly exasperated (panels 3-6) to visibly agitated (panels 7-9), while the attorney below persistently gestures and advocates. The final panel shows the judge's frustration reaching its peak. The satire likely mocks either: verbose legal arguments that test judicial patience, an attorney's relentless persistence despite the judge's obvious annoyance, or the tedious nature of courtroom proceedings. Without date or specific case reference visible, the cartoon works as general commentary on judicial frustration with advocate conduct—a timeless institutional critique.

Judge — June 1933 — page 10 of 38
10 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# "The Theatre of George Jean Nathan" This is a drama critique column, not a political cartoon. Judge's theater critic George Jean Nathan reviews several plays, critiquing both their quality and commercial prospects. Nathan praises Albert Bein's honest play "Little Of Joy" for its authenticity and reformatory setting, but laments that truthful drama struggles financially while "artificial stuff" succeeds commercially. He notes Bein's work lacks full dramatic development despite its merit. He also dismisses "Man Bites Dog" (a tabloid newspaper farce) as poor, though acknowledging George S. Kaufman could improve it. Nathan's recurring complaint: talented writers lack dramatic materials, while experienced dramaturgists possess only stale material—a mismatch preventing good theater. The column advocates for matching skilled writers with worthy subjects.

Judge — June 1933 — page 11 of 38
11 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# "Laughs at the Shows" This page contains four cartoon vignettes satirizing early 20th-century entertainment and social scandals: 1. **Top left**: A scantily-clad woman at a beach ("Take Quake") mocks her small companion, referencing a phone call where someone's voice supposedly aged four years. 2. **Top right**: A domestic scene where a woman announces she's going out, asking a foreman or man for "supper" money—satirizing either labor strikes ("Strike Pink") or marital financial disputes. 3. **Bottom left**: Labeled "Gay Divorce," depicting people in what appears to be a comedic domestic argument scene. 4. **Bottom right**: A car scene labeled "Take Quake," showing people in an automobile, likely satirizing both automotive culture and some unspecified con or scheme ("Used for a temperance trick"). The overall theme appears to mock contemporary theater, scandal, and social behavior through exaggerated caricature.

Judge — June 1933 — page 12 of 38
12 / 38
What you’re looking at · open this page on its own ↗

# "Judging the Sports" — Judge Magazine This article celebrates baseball's resurgence during the Great Depression. The author describes attending a Yankees game at the stadium where he encounters a formerly wealthy man ("new poor") now enjoying simple pleasures with his family—attending baseball games instead of country clubs and golf. The satire targets Depression-era economic hardship with dark humor: families plant potatoes in their lawns to survive; the wealthy ("debs and dowagers") roller-skate in Central Park; Hollywood stars pedal home from studios as a "reducing exercise" (weight loss masked as economy). The piece sentimentally references **Babe Ruth**, baseball's greatest star, apparently nearing retirement. Ruth "lifted baseball out of its besmirched doldrums"—the author suggests the sport provided affordable joy and restored dignity when Americans lost wealth and status. Baseball becomes a democratic escape where rich and poor sit together in bleachers.

Judge — June 1933 — page 13 of 38
13 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 14 of 38
14 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 15 of 38
15 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 16 of 38
16 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 17 of 38
17 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 18 of 38
18 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 19 of 38
19 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 20 of 38
20 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 21 of 38
21 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 22 of 38
22 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 23 of 38
23 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 24 of 38
24 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 25 of 38
25 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 26 of 38
26 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 27 of 38
27 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 28 of 38
28 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 29 of 38
29 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 30 of 38
30 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 31 of 38
31 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 32 of 38
32 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 33 of 38
33 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 34 of 38
34 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 35 of 38
35 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 36 of 38
36 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 37 of 38
37 / 38
Judge — June 1933 — page 38 of 38
38 / 38

Browse this issue page by page

Each page has its own page — the cartoon, who’s in it, and what the satire means.

  1. Page 1 # Analysis This June 1933 *Judge* cover depicts surreal, grotesque creatures in a nightmarish landscape. The creatures appear to be caricatured animals or demon…
  2. Page 2 # Analysis This page is primarily **advertising, not satire or cartooning**. It's a Book-of-the-Month Club promotional ad from Judge magazine, offering a free t…
  3. Page 3 # Analysis This page contains **advertisements only**, not editorial cartoons or satirical content. The left side advertises the **Amstel Hotel** in Amsterdam, …
  4. Page 4 # Analysis This page is primarily **advertising rather than satire or editorial cartoon**. The dominant content comprises two hotel advertisements: 1. **The Wal…
  5. Page 5 # Analysis of Judge Magazine Page (June 1928) The main cartoon depicts a woman at a telephone, apologizing for a misdial. The humor relies on a common early tel…
  6. Page 6 # Political Satire Analysis This Judge magazine page contains two distinct pieces of satire: **"To a Bank Receiver"** is a letter mocking bank receivership duri…
  7. Page 7 # Analysis of Judge Magazine Page This page contains humor pieces rather than political cartoons. The top section, "Revised," mocks contemporary concerns—fallin…
  8. Page 8 # "Mistress Pepys' Journal" by Baird Leonard This satirical column mimics Samuel Pepys' famous diary, but from a female perspective observing high society. The …
  9. Page 9 # Judge Magazine - "Judge" Comic Strip This nine-panel comic depicts a judge presiding over a courtroom, with an attorney (shown below) repeatedly presenting ar…
  10. Page 10 # "The Theatre of George Jean Nathan" This is a drama critique column, not a political cartoon. Judge's theater critic George Jean Nathan reviews several plays,…
  11. Page 11 # "Laughs at the Shows" This page contains four cartoon vignettes satirizing early 20th-century entertainment and social scandals: 1. **Top left**: A scantily-c…
  12. Page 12 # "Judging the Sports" — Judge Magazine This article celebrates baseball's resurgence during the Great Depression. The author describes attending a Yankees game…
  13. Page 13 View this page →
  14. Page 14 View this page →
  15. Page 15 View this page →
  16. Page 16 View this page →
  17. Page 17 View this page →
  18. Page 18 View this page →
  19. Page 19 View this page →
  20. Page 20 View this page →
  21. Page 21 View this page →
  22. Page 22 View this page →
  23. Page 23 View this page →
  24. Page 24 View this page →
  25. Page 25 View this page →
  26. Page 26 View this page →
  27. Page 27 View this page →
  28. Page 28 View this page →
  29. Page 29 View this page →
  30. Page 30 View this page →
  31. Page 31 View this page →
  32. Page 32 View this page →
  33. Page 33 View this page →
  34. Page 34 View this page →
  35. Page 35 View this page →
  36. Page 36 View this page →
  37. Page 37 View this page →
  38. Page 38 View this page →