ComicBooks.com Register / Loginit's free!

Judge, 1913-04-19 · page 16 of 24

Judge — April 19, 1913 — page 16: what you’re looking at

📖 Open the full issue in the page-flip reader →
Judge — April 19, 1913 — page 16: Judge, 1913-04-19

What you’re looking at

This page contains Emma Caustic's satirical lecture opposing women's suffrage by mocking female aesthetic preferences. The argument: women care excessively about beauty and appearance, so if granted voting rights, they'll vote based on candidates' looks rather than merit—wasting public funds on frivolous campaign aesthetics and potentially electing handsome nonentities. The cartoon depicts an angelic or ethereal female figure, likely representing idealized womanhood, reinforcing Caustic's ironic tone. Below are brief "Suffragette Snapshots"—mocking suffrage advocates through anecdotes: a man walking with a donkey (implying women voters are foolish), bakers' strikes (implying women once solved problems through domestic work), and dance crazes (suggesting women are frivolous). The page also advertises Naiad Dress Shields, a feminine hygiene product. **Context**: This represents anti-suffrage rhetoric from the early 1900s, using gendered stereotypes to argue women shouldn't vote.

📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)

Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.

SHE-NO DG Lectures More about the Esthete I HAVE suggested to you, dear sisters, how often we find that woman exacts beauty in all things that pertain to home, including husbands. But it is not enough that the beauty microbe should infect the home. It crawls into the dealings that woman has with that horny-handed world called labor. How many helpful Hildas, how many competent Coras, ranged a, the drear walls of our employment agen- cies, are ruthlessly scorned because their pulchritude shines within the soul and not without the skin! While man dis- counts dimples and dash, frowns on frizzes and shudders at shapes, woman, in her insatiable search for looks, vociferously demands cleaners with complexions and cooks with curves. And so it is that the floods of clamorous claimants for the hon- orary title of D. D. (Domestic Drudge) are barred from fireside gymnastics, and the servant problem goeth forth wailing throughout the land. And, then, how our worthy tradesmen suffer! Who is getting rich to-day in the emporiums of chops and shirtwaists? Is it he who has the best meat or the best mustache? Is it food or feet, eggs or eyes, cheeks or cheese, hair or ham? Do prices win or prettiness? Let our stom- achs and pocketbooks groan an answer, and let us bow our heads in shame that we belong to the sappy sex. Yet, when we see that even the stage is affected by female estheticism, so that petticoated mobs attend the’gyrations of @ gorgeous and gaudy Maude Adams, neglecting the while the ethereal and spiritual charms of a Lillian Russell, let us brace ourselves with a mighty vow Emma o f that we will keep women from the sacred arena of politics. For what will they demand, my sis- ters? Hand-painted ballots, beribboned voting booths, flower-decked platforms, speeches set to music and rose shaded halls, such as burst into being in the Lor nostas AN OFFICER OUR STREETS NEED wake of the enfranchised female of the West. Worst of all, obsessed by their likings, they will vote en masse for the handsomest candidate that rears his head above the common herd of tax-paying nonentities. And if we thus drained the finances of our parties, depriving some RIVA OMAN Caustic patient politician of his rightful graft, who could justify such a shameful waste of public moneys? None of us who think, Yet this is not all. If women vote, and time, money, energy are all poured at their feet in wanton prodigal- ity, it may be all for naught. For, while colors and ribbons and bands abound to satisfy the most exacting taste, where, I ask you in despair—where, judging from the campaign pictures of the past—where shall we find a handsome candidate? Can you not hear the home stampede of the feminine army routed by the first male countenances that meet their dizzy view? Verily, you can. Let us, therefore, rise in our might and in crescendo accents protest against the entrance of the esthete into a realm where beauty is as out of place as a pebble in a pie. Oreos We Maskell Suffragists You notice, every time you read, How oft they get in print these days; And better proof no man can need That advertising surely pays. Suffragette Snapshots A man has started to walk with a don- key from Maine to Oregon on an election bet. The photographers should label their pictures, ‘‘Find the Man!’’ a] Now 12,000 bakers are going on strike. It didn’t use to be that way when the nation’s wives and mothers baked the bread. ) The turkey trot and bunny hug have been replaced by the goose waddle, which is really much more indicative of those who dance it. Hs ested Harper “The Crowning Attribute of Lovely Woman is Cleanliness” The well-dressed woman blesses and benefits herself—and the world—for she adds to its joys. Naiad Dress Shields add the final assurance of cleanliness and sweetness. woman of delicacy, refinement and good judgment. They are a necessity to the Naiad Dress Shields are hygienic and scientific. They are absolutely free from rubber with its unpleas- ant odor. They can be quickly sterilized by immersing in boiling water for a few seconds only. The only shield as good the day it is bought as the day it is made. Made in all styles and sizes to fit every requirement of Women’s Dress. At stores or sample pair on receipt of 25c. Every pair guaranteed. The C. E. CONOVER CO., Mfrs., 101 Franklin Street, New York comicbooks.com