Life, 1923-06-14 · page 14 of 44
Life — June 14, 1923 — page 14: what you’re looking at
What you’re looking at
This satirical comic page mocks economic and political discussion by having cartoon characters debate serious policy matters (financial fundamentals, legislation, education, credit systems) while being portrayed as intellectually vacant "boobs." The subtitle explains the premise: since editorials are no longer read, why not have comic strip characters deliver editorial commentary instead? The satire cuts two ways—critiquing both the public (too foolish to understand serious issues) and the media (resorting to cartoons to communicate important matters). References include debates over economic law, new legislation, public valuation schemes, and credit instruments, suggesting this reflects early-to-mid 20th century financial/political discourse, likely during economic uncertainty or reform debates.
📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)
Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.
WWTEREST NATURALLY ‘were 1S PReOF HERE REMAWS HIGH Becavse ALSO OF How BRSELESS ARE “THE CHARGES So FREQUENTLY HEARD “Thar BANKING OR LEGS- LATIVE POWERS MIGHT. HAVE CHECKED “HE RIGORS OF PREDICATING Tiar THERE. ARE CERTA EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES WHICK PERSIST TuROUGHOUT THE WHOLE CouRSE OF TEACHING BuT WitouT PURPORTING To Be EXHAUSTIVE. we woud DIRECT ATTENTION 16 THE AN INTEREST RATE OF 6 PERCENT, A rx RATE OF 2% Fencert AND AN INSURANCE ap DEPRECIATION RATE oF 3% PERCENT ALL ar TOGETHER mace «A CHARGE OF [2 PERCENT HAS Deen SLOW ABouT UNDERSTANDING WHAT “THE AMERICAN VALUATION IN ANY NEW LEGG. SCHEME MEANS LATION LET US HoPE, Then, THAT THE DELUSION wil — NOT BE FoLLowsp —Tar Economic = Law THE MATTER OF FINANCIAL FAILURES, HOWEVER, 15 mene MINOR PETAL TS Hie UNDER- LYING FUNDAMENTALS oF THE FuTurE “he FunDAMEenTAL WANT 1S NOT inS- THE SITUATION MIGHT STL ' HAVE BEEK SAVED HAD “Were BEEN CAPABLE LEADERSUIP IN THE NEW ADMINISTRATION TERE 1S No SUCK ee IP AND Now IT IS LEADERSH. PLAIN THAT THERE Con BE NOTHING CouLD Be Out of the Mouths of Boobs Since editorials are no longer read, why not let the comic characters speak the Editorial Mind? comicbooks.com