comicbooks.com Join Free

Life, 1894-07-05 · page 7 of 16

Life — July 5, 1894 — page 7: what you’re looking at

📖 Open the full issue in the page-flip reader →
Life — July 5, 1894 — page 7: Life, 1894-07-05

What you’re looking at

# Analysis of Life Magazine Page 7 This page contains two distinct elements: **Top photograph/illustration:** A parlor scene showing people in what appears to be early 20th-century dress. The dialogue suggests a domestic comedy: Papa asks if Mr. Sandyman visited ("I looked into the parlor and saw no one but you"), Clara confirms he was there, Papa claims not seeing him, and Willy jokes that "he must have got into the chain first!" This appears to be a humorous visual gag about a guest disappearing or hiding, likely from a serialized story or comic sequence. **Bottom illustration:** Two figures outdoors. The caption reads "Well, Tom, what sort of Fourth did you have?" with Tom's response "Are yer blind?" This references Independence Day celebrations and suggests Tom experienced some mishap—possibly fireworks-related injury—making the question sarcastically inappropriate. Both are light domestic humor typical of Life's satirical content.

📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)

Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.

Papa: Was MR. SANDYMAN HERE LAST EVENING? I WuHuy, YES, FATHER, HE WAS THERE, STRANGE I DIDN'T SEE HIM. 1 GUESS HE MUST HAVE GOT INTO THE CHAIR LOOKED INTO THE PARLOR AND SAW NO ONE BUT YOU, FIRST! critic himself, than from the sinister manoeuvring of the counting-room—which has so many more important financial problems to deal with that it can’t waste time on the minu- tia of literary criticism.’ In the “great” newspapers it is looked upon as a necessary evil, and is used more or less as “filling” on off days when the news is light. The things which really arouse the critical attention of a first-class counting-room must at least reach the importance of a Baking Powder or Soap Ad. Those fellows often take a page at atime! But the man or woman (particularly the woman) who has reviewed books for five or ten years has accumulated an array of prejudices and personal animosities that appal the ordinary generous-minded man of commerce. You can never tell when you are going to touch off the fire-works. And the most unfair of them all is apt to be the specially retained “ special- ist’ who writes only on books of a certain class, because he is believed to “ know it all.” And in every criticism that he writes he is expected to justify his omniscience at the expense of the other fellow and his book. For this reason a careful reader of the’ press will tell you that some of the best literary criticism current will be found in the columns of certain provincial newspapers where it is written by a good “all round” man who loves books and reading for their own sakes, and not because of any faction or school which they represent. “WELL, Tom, WHAT SORT 0’ FOURTH DID YOU HAVE?” Tom: ARE YER BLIND?