Judge — December 25, 1926 — page 9: what you’re looking at

What you’re looking at

# "Where the White Line Ought to Be" This cartoon uses a traffic/road safety metaphor to critique judicial decision-making. The image depicts various vehicles navigating a curved road, with the title suggesting debate over proper road markings—specifically where white lines (road boundaries) should be placed. The "Judge" header indicates this addresses court rulings. The cartoon likely satirizes judicial decisions about regulatory boundaries or legal limits that were controversial at the time. The vehicles of different sizes represent different parties or interests competing for road space, suggesting the court's role in establishing fair "boundaries" or rules. Without dating information visible, the specific legal case or controversy remains unclear, but the satire targets judges for potentially drawing boundaries (legal rulings) in places that seem arbitrary or unfair to some parties.