Judge, 1920-04-24 · page 27 of 36
Judge — April 24, 1920 — page 27: what you’re looking at
What you’re looking at
This page satirizes early cinema's pretensions to high art. The title mockingly suggests movies lack genuine artistry, and the photos show film actors awkwardly attempting to demonstrate "artistic" skills—painting, sculpting, and drawing—for the camera. The captions highlight the absurdity: actors pause mid-performance to exhibit fake artistic credentials (holding palettes "wrong," borrowing studio props, pretending to carve plaster as marble). The satire targets both Hollywood's social climbing (wanting to appear cultured) and cinema's artificiality generally—audiences are asked to believe transparent fabrications presented as authentic artistry. This reflects 1920s cultural tensions: movies were still considered low entertainment by elites, and the industry fought this perception through elaborate fakery. Judge's satire exposes this desperation as precisely the opposite of genuine artistic credibility.
📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)
Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.
The Artless Art of the Movies n drawing an infer tre CLARK demonstrates her abilit mM a fecent criticism wre to ex a water-color sketch with a bottle « Cuarkits Ray, Rororiy Datrox, is waiting for the carrera « he TN Me HAN is exe for pinching the plaster cast i (Tn P Pl p before she spoils the hired canvas she is supp ing. which you are asked to believe he has carved out of Parian marble.