Judge, 1910-07-23 · page 16 of 16
Judge — July 23, 1910 — page 16: what you’re looking at
What you’re looking at
This page contains two domestic humor cartoons typical of early Judge magazine satire. **"A Put-Up Job"** depicts a cook accusing a boy (Johnny) of not stopping a cat from eating pudding. The joke plays on blame-shifting: Johnny deliberately allows the cat access so he won't be accused of theft himself—a cynical commentary on how servants or children in households were routinely blamed for missing food. **"A Big Difference"** shows two neighbors discussing laundry. One claims he wouldn't wash for his own wife, but the other cheekily suggests he *would* wash for his neighbor's wife—implying an affair or inappropriate attraction. This is marital infidelity humor, common to the era. Both cartoons reflect working-class and domestic anxieties: servants' precarious positions and marital suspicion. The humor relies on viewers understanding period household hierarchies and gender dynamics.
📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)
Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.
A PUT-UP JOB. The cook—"' Johnny, why didn't you chase the cat away from that pudding ?"” Johnny—"* ‘Cause if I did you 'd blame me for eating it."" A BIG DIFFERENCE. Neighbor—" I'd be hanged 17 I 'd -vash for my wife."’ Wiggins—* You might not for your wife, but zou would for mine."