Life, 1920-04-22 · page 18 of 44
Life — April 22, 1920 — page 18: what you’re looking at
What you’re looking at
**Top Cartoon ("At the Club"):** Shows three well-dressed men at a club reacting with exaggerated horror and disgust. The caption indicates the new Entertainment Committee chairman is planning "jazz entertainment" for next month. The satire mocks upper-class snobbery toward jazz music—then considered vulgar, modern, and associated with lower classes and African Americans. The gentlemen's appalled expressions ridicule their stuffy resistance to contemporary popular culture. **"Modern Leap-Year Song":** A woman rejects marriage proposals, preferring economic independence through employment. This satirizes the "Leap Year" tradition (when women supposedly propose to men) while commenting on women's changing attitudes toward marriage versus financial security—a progressive social commentary for the era. **"Self-Confessed":** Life mocks an Indiana doctor who published a cruel article about dogs. Rather than attack him directly, the magazine argues his signed article self-exposes his character. The satire suggests that people reveal their true nature through their cruelty—their own words condemn them more effectively than outside criticism.
📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)
Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.
AT THE CLUB THE NEW CHAIRMAN OF THE ENTERTAIN MENT COM MITTEE HIDEOUS DETMILS OF THE JAZZ ENTERTAINMENT HE HAS PLANNED FOR NEXT MONTH A Modern Leap-Year Song H. me! why should 1 marry me? Lovers are plenty, but fortunes are few. Why lose wages that carry me Better by far than a busband could do? Fond youth, calmly I'm viewing you, Steeling a heart that might Mutter and throb: I've no thought of pursuing you: Poverty’s stupid—I'll stick to my job. Self-Confessed As Indiana doctor has contributed to the fianapolis Medical Journal for March an article on dogs. .\ friend of those animals sends it to Lire with a request “to make life miserable for the unfortunate wretch who wrote i It is a very nasty article—much too disgusting to quote but there is nothing Lire could do abowt it to advantage The author has signed his name, and thereby las attended to his own case much more thoroughly than anyone else could. The article exhibits his mind and reveals nature Whoever reads it knows not only what he thinks of dogs, but what manner of soul he has inside of him. Nothing that anyone could say of him would be so injurious to him as this signed article, not about himself, but about dogs. The life of this doctor is miserable enough already. It PNLIVENS THE OLD MEMBERS WITH THE must be. Such people cannot be happy. They have the mental or spiritual qualifications. We would hy means add the least mite of misery to this man’s life does not know it, but he has made a full confession of what he is. We can take his word that he is wretched enough. He hasn't done dogs any harm, though he | tried to, but any kind dog would pity him for what he done to himself “WHO WANTS THE HANDSOME WAITER comicbooks.com