ComicBooks.com Register / Loginit's free!

Life, 1906-03-08 · page 11 of 32

Life — March 8, 1906 — page 11: what you’re looking at

📖 Open the full issue in the page-flip reader →
Life — March 8, 1906 — page 11: Life, 1906-03-08

What you’re looking at

This page contains theatrical reviews from *Life* magazine. The main illustration depicts a **snake** (labeled "SATAN"), which serves as a visual metaphor for the page's discussion of dramatic works. The text critiques several contemporary plays, including "The Title Mart" by Churchill, "The Triangle" (involving Harvard), and others. The reviews discuss how these plays handle character development and social commentary—particularly noting which works succeed or fail in depicting English and American society authentically. The snake imagery likely represents the satirical "evil" or moral challenges depicted in these theatrical productions, fitting *Life*'s tradition of using pointed visual metaphors to frame cultural criticism. The reviews themselves focus on whether playwrights convincingly portray human motivation and social dynamics rather than relying on shallow stereotypes.

📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)

Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.

the author gives him, or make a disturbance leaving the house. In the views of life Mr. Hughes shows in the play, it seems that he must be looking with distorted or mistaken vision, and his ways of reproducing what he sees are not graphic. He either slurs his points or over-elaborates them. From this latter fault, the one original scene which might have made the play suflers worst of all. In the effort to show that his leading characters are too well-bred to quarrel or commit murder before their servants, he drags out the details of adinner service to the point of fatiguing his audience beyond endurance. This scene, drawn in broader strokes and better acted than it was by Charlotte Walker and Mr. Gott- schalk, might have been a moving one; as it was written and rendered, it was ineffective. This is not to say that Mr. Hughes may not some day write a play. In The Triangle” he has given no convincing evidence of his abil- ity to do so. * . . R. WINSTON CHURCHILL is a more experienced hand but he, too, shows in- expertness in handling his material in“ The Title Mart." The material itself is none too good, the basic theme being the rather hack- neyed one of the barter between title-hunting America and fortune-hunting England. His medium is a satirical comedy, and it is to be recorded that his satire on both English and American society is considerably more successful than his comedy. The complica- tions which form the basis of his plot are so flimsy in themselves and so awkwardly han- dled that they are a strain on the indulgence of the mbst kindly disposed spectator. His characters are, with the exception of the English woman with a courtesy title who is visiting America and frankly utilizing her hosts in perfect British style, familiar stage material, They are well cast and made the most of by a list of capable artists, including Ffolliott Paget, May Pardoe and Messrs. Frank Gillmore, Arthur Hare, Sam Edwards, Murray Carson, and Sam Reed. The leading young woman is Dorothy Revell, who possesses a curious but attractive personality. Her pecul- iar, impassive method of depicting the youth- ful heroine raises the question of whether she is pushing limited powers to their extreme or repressing very considerable strength. “The Title Mart” is fairly amusing in a rather conventional way, but does not pro- gress Mr. Churchill's claims to recognition as a dramatist. ambitious in its aim, and simpler in L its method, than either of the above is Rida Johnson Young's ** Brown of Harvard.” It shows a really stronger grasp of dramatic possibilities than the work of the better known literary men, More than that, it shows a more intimate knowledge of the material she is dealing with and of actual human motives of action, To be sure, she 1s vastly aided by the college atmosphere created outside of her work asa writer, but this is a perfectly legitimate aid for the dramatist and does not detract from the merit of her accomplishment. But she, too, shows her inexpertness by permitting her simple but well-constructed plot to lose its third act climax in a feebly amateurish way. The author attempts to do for Harvard in this piece what Mr. George Ade did for the rural university in The College Widow.” She has not created so many humorous characters nor has she anything like Mr. Ade's power of fun-making, but she has infused into her play quite enough of the university spirit to make it recognizable as a reasonably faithful picture. Above all, it carries with it the swing and go of youth in its sentiment, its devil-may-care ways and its villainies, Under the direction of Mr. Henry Miller the play is well staged and its cast is well chosen. Mr. Harry Woodruff, who actually confesses to the age of twenty-seven, here commences his career as a star, and his youthful appear- ance makes him acceptable as the hero who 313 steps into the ‘varsity boat, and, of course, at the vital moment, snatches victory from de- feat. * Brown of Harvard” is the best in the recent American invasion of the American stage. I it meets with the pecuniary success which seems to await it, the play will probably in- spire the Theatrical Trust to follow its usual tactics of imitation and give us a succession of copies with such titles as Smith of Yale,” “Jones of Princeton,” “Wiggins of Johns Hopkins,” ** McFadden of the University of Chicago,” * Maymie of Vassar,” etc. . * * BOSTON reader of Lire sends in this information: To te Eorroe or Lirn: For heaven sake tip off Metcalfe to let up on the Skindi- cate, or at any rate Charlie Frohman, before you have the Irish down upon your back like a hod of brick, What! you didn’t know there was any Irish in Charlie? Why, certainly there is. Listen to this from his article on Barrie in Harpers’ of Feb, roth: “There is rich human blood in everything he docs. He is a satirist whose arrows are never barbed with vitriol, but with the milk of human kindness.” GHW. Judging by Mr, David Belasco’s recent un- fortunate experience, it is to be feared that when Mr, Charles Frohman turns author he is betrayed by some genial Irishman who does the writing. Metcalfe. Academy of Music—*The Heart of Mary- land.” Emotional war drama. Belasco.—* The if] of the Golden West,"* Blanche Bates, Mr. Frank Keenan and exceilent cast in absorbing American play. Bijon.— David Warfield in his admirable im- personation of the old German in the moving comedy, "The Music Mast Broadway.— ‘The Vanderbilt Cup.” Very ordinary musical piece, slightly redeemed by the cleverness of Elsie Janis as 3 mimi Casino,—“The Earl and the Gi cast in English musical play. Di Empire.—Barrie’s * Peter Pan,’ Adams asthe star, Unusual and ‘highly interest- ing fairy play. Field julie Bonbon.” | Agreeable light comedy of present-day New York life. Clara Lipman and Mr. Louis Mann in suitable parts. Garrick.—Mr, Charles Richman and company in Mr. David Gray's *Gallops."” Polite light comedy of fashionable “hossey.” society. Herald Square,—" George Washington, Jr.” A highly illuminating example of cheap vulgarity on, the stage. “ Hippodrome. —" A Society Circus"? and ** The Court’ of the Golden Fountains.” Spectacular, gorgeous and highly amusing. Tudwon. “The” Duel." Excellently acted drama of the modern French society school. Knickerbocker, —** M'lle Modiste."" Musical iece. Good results from the combined ¢florts of Victor Herbert, Henry Blossom and Fritzi Scheff. Lyric. —" Mexicana.” Comic opera of more than average merit. a ‘Madison Square —" The Title Mart.” See above. Manhattan, See opposite. Princess. See above. Proctor's Fifth Avenue.—Stock company in weekly chagge of bill. Savey.—" Mr. Hopkinson.” A most laughable and well-acted English farce-comed; Weber's Theatre. Twiddle Twaddle * and burlesque on popular plays. Music, fun and girls, American comicbooks.com