Life, 1901-12-26 · page 12 of 33
Life — December 26, 1901 — page 12: what you’re looking at
What you’re looking at
# Analysis This *Life* magazine page (558) is an editorial discussion defending the publication itself against criticism. The text argues that *Life* has editorial independence, publishing what it deems appropriate regardless of outside pressure—specifically referencing criticism about Philippine coverage and complaints about "ipecac" (a purgative drug, likely used here metaphorically for harsh truths). The three portrait illustrations identify contributors or subjects: **C. Allan Gilbert** (top right), **W. A. Rogers** (bottom left), and **Albert D. Blashfield** (bottom right). These appear to be notable cartoonists or writers associated with the magazine. The decorative illustrations surrounding the portraits—including cherubs and allegorical figures—are typical *Life* magazine embellishments from this early 1900s era, adding visual interest rather than conveying specific political commentary.
📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)
Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.
558 -LIFE- “I am not in accord with the teachings of Lirr of late, In my mind hey are un Anierican to the extent of being treasonabl ~ It seems to me that everyone ought to read Lire, I could easily select a dozen different features of Jour pever. each of which is well worth the subseription price, This, added to the evident ‘honesty of purpose and fearlexenees in the right, makes it an abeolute necessity to those who have ¢ made its acquaintance.” Ido not care to have a paper in my houge that is In favor of hauling down the flag.” “1 would rooner go without oatmeal and cream and even my morning coffee than miss the fun and vigor that Lirg imparts."* “Lam more than pleased with your position on all questions, especially the Philippine qaestion. 1 wish’ half the sermons preached were equal to your editorials.” * In addition to your political cartoons and comments, pictures and Iteme bave appeared which are sufficient to disgust anybody with the least ecrap of decency or common sense.” — And there were many others, Of course we prefer honey to ipecac, though both havo their uses. Isut no child can prospor on ipecac alone, Lire has bad his full share of {pecao, and of round shot, dynamite and cold steel, but his digestion still holds good and his capacity for work and travol remains unimpaired. Who can blame a pleasure-lov- ing infant for enjoying such bits as these, both from the same lotter ? j J have been greatly Impreseed with the energetic and tenacious manner with which you have, ments.** “The whole tone and character of Lire is clean, vigorous and entertain. ing. Lonly regret that it entertains political views different from my own,” from time to time, prosecuted certain reform move- However, there are cruel moments when he may havo a suspt- cion that the writer in the Chap Book was correct in his letter from America, when he said: * Finally, sit, there is Lire. Lire is the best we have, bat It is, after all, 4 bandle of lost opportunities, C. ALLAN GILBERT ALBERT D. BLASHF!! comicbooks.com