Judge, 1925-02-07 · page 3 of 36
Judge — February 7, 1925 — page 3: what you’re looking at
What you’re looking at
# Judge Magazine Political Satire Page Analysis This page from *Judge* magazine presents a series of rhetorical questions the publication believes a "Judge" (presumably representing judicial authority or common sense) should ask about contemporary issues. The topics span Prohibition enforcement, income tax policy, drug regulation, and entertainment censorship—suggesting early-to-mid 20th century American debates. The bottom illustration shows a well-dressed man announcing he's purchased a Rembrandt painting, with the caption mocking his patriotic claim that "American cars are good enough for me!" The satire critiques wealthy Americans who buy European art while claiming patriotic support for American goods—exposing hypocrisy in nationalist rhetoric. The scattered questions above function as social commentary on government inconsistency and ineffectiveness across multiple policy areas.
📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)
Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.
“LIFE LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF JUDGE WANTS TO KNOW- IF the eclipse was noticeable in or. has Congress been ymuch that they couldn't tell the difference? WHY Hi Jolson doesn’t stay in California for the winter? WHAT Mayor Hylan think when he takes a ride in the subway— bout or doesn’t? HOW the bootleggers tell a pro hibition WHY music? they “7 just bought a Rembrandt.” Patriotic AMERICAN don't ent from a hi-jacker? broadcast HAPPINESS"’ WHY simplify the matter by putting out the doesn't ernment income tax blanks in the form of crossword puzzles? WHY drug stores don't open free lunch counters? WHY | Gerald didn't realize that the best place for his kind of stuff was in the movies? Chapman ! comicbooks.com m |