Judge, 1916-08-12 · page 22 of 28
Judge — August 12, 1916 — page 22: what you’re looking at
What you’re looking at
This page combines advertisement and satirical editorial commentary on women's suffrage, a heated political issue of the early 20th century. **The Advertisement** (left) promotes a serialized fiction story in *Collier's* magazine about "Baron Starkheim" by Melville Davisson Post. **The Editorial Content** (right), by Anna Cadogan Etz, uses humor to critique anti-suffrage arguments. It presents several satirical scenarios: men claiming women should remain silent and domestic because they distract from business; a rural voter refusing to sign a suffrage petition out of superstitious distrust of all humans; and a Colorado man opposing suffrage because his wife might ask him about tariff policy. The piece also notes that women jurors, contrary to male fears, prove competent and agreeable. The satire's point: male objections to women's voting rights are absurd, contradictory, and rooted in self-interest rather than principle.
📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)
Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.
Who was Baron Starkheim? When you find out at the end of Melville Davisson Post’s story, ‘“The Baron Stark- heim’’, you will admit that you have read one of the year’s most strikingly unusual pieces of fiction. Look for it in the August 12th issue of Collier's THE NATIONAL WEEKLY 416 West 13th Street, New York City THE MODERN WOMay Suffrage Facts and Fancies By ANNA CADOGAN ETZ The Ide. § Woman and the Needs of Man I ONE listens to what men say about their ideal of woman, it j told that men most approve that woman who stays in the a God in his wisdom appointed for her. If one notes the needs or wi of man, it is to notice a constant relation between those needs or bins and man’s ideal of woman. The modern man will tell you with his hand on his heart that the making and keeping woman is the apple of his eye. But ‘twas not evere Search Holy Writ and it is the silent woman who is most extolled and eles “gift of God.” It happens that in those ancient of days men were given to the cs templative life. As the modern man looks outside himself for knowles the ancient man looked inside, and if he knew himself he thought that knew all there was to know, So it was that the chattering of women ie terfered with the more or less pious meditations of men and the ideal woes was constructed with this need of man in plain sight. It happens that in modern life men have laboriously: built up the po and business world and the intrusion of woman distresses them more th they can say. Hence the ideal woman is one who stays where she at interfere with business or politics. ‘The conclusion is a bit mortifying to woman. Candor compels her recognize herself in the historical réle of annoying man by: her preset Her one comfort lics in the greater enthusiasm shown for women by m of equal suffrage states. Her one hope lies in the passage of the Fede ffrage Amendment through which men may come to know that wom: not nearly So irritating to have around as woman as a chat as an equal i: or political incompetent. The Difficulty of Winning by Referendum ad | =VER sign nothin’ for nobody,” said a rural fair goer firmly the pretty girl in the suffrage booth who asked him to sign a worm: | suffrage slip. “Well.” she retorted, “if the world is such a tricky place with men ne ning it that you can’t trust a single human being, you certainly have nothieg to fear from woman suffrage. Maybe woman suffrage would impm things. You had better sign the slip and take a chance on it.” To whi he replied with pious unction, “* Ma‘am, I never gamble.” Why Some Men Vote “No” OME MEN are opposed to woman suffrage for no definite reasoa te from something much more baffling—an instinct of aversion. Some men are opposed to woman suffrage and they know exactly # and of such was the man who voted “no” in Colorado and explained s cinctly to his companion as they left the polling place: “Do you think te I am going to live in the house with a woman who might ask me to ey the tariff to her? And that is just what might happen if my wife vo The Woman Juror a Comfort and a Pleasure =,” would probably be the reply made by the averaged bailiff to the question, “How would you like to deal with wena jurors?” But, as a matter of fact, court liffs are discovering West, where jury service for women has followed close on the heels ol © for women, that the woman juror makes life for the bailifi and not less delightful. The latest news to this eficet relates to the all-woman jury in San Diego county, California. The loca tL press reper that the women received compliments all along the line as better tempert more agrecable, and more tractable than men jurors are wont to be. court bailiff even admitted that the ordeal of taking them out to di had proved no ordeal at all but a pleasure. The moral is obvious. Men like women and the society of wome whole lot more than they are willing to admit, and experience in thew suffrage states has proved that men like women in politics not | more. To cite a bit of proof: It was only the other day that the a delegate to the Mississippi Valley Suffrage Conference listed, as oneal most imposing results of woman suffrage her city, the entrance & politics of great numbers of men who never before had even prete® to discharge their political duties.