Judge, 1909-10-02 · page 2 of 16
Judge — October 2, 1909 — page 2: what you’re looking at
What you’re looking at
This page satirizes competing claims about Arctic exploration. The main article "Who's Who at the North Pole" addresses confusion over discovery credit, specifically debating whether Peary or Cook deserves recognition. The text references the "New York World" newspaper's coverage and notes that Cook's accomplishment was disputed. The bottom cartoon, titled "See What I Have Brought You!" depicts Arctic explorers in conflict—likely representing the Peary-Cook rivalry—with figures labeled "NORTH POLE," "PLUCK," and "RUNNING" tangled together. The satire mocks how both explorers' competing claims created chaos rather than clear achievement. The sidebar "Dressing by the Clock" jokes about a judge's ruling on women's dress schedules, an unrelated humorous piece typical of Judge's satirical magazine format.
📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)
Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.
Arthur Terry, ing. Chicago, Hit - Hamilton, Art Editor, Cable Address, “Judgark.” Tel. 6632 Madison square. PW. Subscriptions payable in advance by. which areata To Canadian Provinces — International News Company, Bream's building, Chancery Lane, , Areans ae Opera, Pars; Saarbach's News bechange, Marne, tim New Vork Cty. The contents of FUDGE are crotected by conyright tn both the United States a'd Great Britain. CONTPIBUTORS must inctose 4 stamped and self adsvessed envelope with ail manusrDtse otherivise return of the Latter when fours unabailable cannot be guaranteed. 1 JUDGE cannot be foued at any cews-atend, tbe pubiisbere will be under obligations if that fact be promptly reported om postal-card or by letter. HACK NUMBERS: Prevent year, 10 * is poles,"’ and the one at ninety ‘8 north latitude has been discov- ered. If you have not read anything about it in the newspapers, it will be good news to read in the New York Evening Mail that “ the winter Peary- odicals will be full of the discovery."* made, of course, and the ions one of Cook's in not sending the savants a souvenir postal card. Another mistake, recorded by the Dallas News, was the failure of Dr. Cook to look at the tongue of the Pole when he took its temperature. The question, What lies around the North Po should be, in the opinion of the ew York World, changed to, ** Who lies about it?” An excellent suggestion is of- fered by the Pittsburgh Gazette-Times, when this paper advises that judgment as to Peary’s claims be suspended until we know how many barrels of gumdrops he had with him." The Chicago Tribune has the audacity to say, ‘ Surely there can’t be two North Poles!"* The deduction is made by the Baltimore Sun that too many stars- and-stripe ailers spoil the broth. Without explaining the reason for its position, the New York World holds that ‘any one who didn’t sail in the Roosevelt naturally falls into the Ananias class."* The true purpose of a polar expedition is probably exposed by the New York Evening Mail, when its poetical editor says, Peary and Cook! “ Peary and Cook ! for the book !"" Now is the time to subseri Tyo > WHAT I HAVE coats. 1997, 39 cents address, and the From two to there weeks mont *s Weekly says, ‘It occurs to some tive people that they might properly inquire if Com Peary was in the pay and service of the United S$ Pe while on his trip to the Pole. If so, is he entitled to all the emolu ments from the publication of his story, books, lectures, ete., based on his No one wishes to detract from any of the credit that b ape the conclusion ers et we cannot we attribute to polar discov decided hankering after what the Good Look calls “filthy lucre. A note of warning—which should reach African shores—is sounded by the New York World; ** With Cook and Peary in the field of authorship, African hunting stories may not get better than third place in the list of the six best sellers."" The decision of Juncr: is that the playing of a straightforward, manly game is more to be admired than mere victory. DRESSING BY THE CLOCK. I CHICAGO a chauffeur was recently fined for k: ng his auto- mobile “ chug-chugging " for an hour while waiting on a pub- lie street. ‘The excuse of the chauffeur was that he was wait- ing for a woman to get her pocketbook. The judge explains his position as follows: ** Woman takes too in dressing and primping. She will take half an hour to adjust three hairpins, ‘I'll be ready in five minutes,’ is her usual grecting to her escort. She will then go upstairs and take an hour fixing herself up, You might have known that and stopped your engine. Women should be made to dress by the clock, the same as a man works. They should run on schedule time.”* In this decision J fully concurs, but will the Chicago jurist please tell how to enforce a decision to make women dress by the clock? much tim BROUGHT You!" comichooks,