Judge, 1900-07-07 · page 5 of 16
Judge — July 7, 1900 — page 5: what you’re looking at
What you’re looking at
This is a satirical cartoon titled "Brutal" that mocks overzealous animal protection advocates through a dialogue between two women (Maude and Ella). The joke relies on exaggeration: Maude claims she wanted to arrest a streetcar motorman for animal cruelty because he ran over a frog. This absurdly trivial incident—an unavoidable accident involving a common amphibian—is treated with the same seriousness one might reserve for intentional animal abuse. The satire targets early 20th-century animal welfare activists, portraying them as ridiculous and humorless for taking minor incidents to legal extremes. The cartoon suggests such reformers lack proportional judgment and perspective. The illustration's elegant Art Nouveau style contrasts with the pedestrian scenario, emphasizing the pretentiousness of the complaint.
📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)
Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.
\N CENRKNYW \\ STAN QwS, BRUTAL. Mavpe—‘* If I could have found a policeman this morning I'd have had a motorman arrested for cruelty to animals.” —" Why ; what did he do?” AUDE—" Why, he ran over a frog.” ~~ comicbooks.com