comicbooks.com Join Free
HomeThe Atom › #9
The Atom #9 cover
Cover: Gil Kane & Murphy Anderson

The Atom #9

Oct 1963 · DC · 0.12 USD
☆ Be the first to review + Add to your collection — Join free
“The Atom's Phantom Double!”

From DC's November 1963 issue, this entry in Ray Palmer's solo series pits the Atom against a chilling threat — his own double. The cover, penciled by Gil Kane and inked by Murphy Anderson, dramatizes the danger perfectly: a grim doppelgänger wielding an opal ring bears down on our red-and-blue hero, both figures rendered tiny against a giant rotary telephone and a stack of oversized books — that perfect Silver Age trick of making the miniature world feel enormous. The cover dialogue lays out the stakes with sharp economy, promising a story by Gardner Fox and Gil Kane that toys with identity, size, and what it means to exist in the real world.

Was this helpful and accurate?
writer Gardner Fox · artist Gil Kane · inker Sid Greene · letterer Gaspar Saladino · cover Gil Kane, Murphy Anderson

This exact issue on

Raw — FN/VF $64 1 listing Raw — FN $34.99 1 listing Raw — VG+ $36 1 listing
Raw — VG $28–$35 2 listings
Raw / ungraded $14.95–$44.98 2 listings
Verified matches for The Atom #9 · eBay asking prices, seen 6 hours ago

More listings for this title

GD $9.95 VG+ $13.99 VG $16.5 FN $16.96 FINE $17.8 VG $19.99 VG $22 VG $27.5
Related listings we couldn't confirm as this exact issue · 9 total · seen 6 hours ago

Sell my copy

Have this issue — or a whole collection? Get a fair offer from us, skip the marketplace fees and the hassle.

We Buy Collections ▸
Fast, fair offers · we handle grading & shipping

Full credits

artist Gil Kane
cover pencils Gil Kane
cover inks Murphy Anderson

Full plot ⚠ may contain spoilers

▸ Reveal full plot — may contain spoilers

Tha Atom travels back to Holland in the year 1610 where he meets explorer Henry Hudson and Jan Lippershey, inventor of the telsscope.

Plot details indexed by the Grand Comics Database (CC BY-SA).

Key issues in The Atom

Reviews

Reader reviews

No reader reviews yet.