ComicBooks.com Register / Loginit's free!
HomeHarper's Weekly: The Cartoons of Thomas NastNast & the Birth of the Political Cartoon › Was It Not a Rum Disaster, After All, at Spuyten Duyvil?
Was It Not a Rum Disaster, After All, at Spuyten Duyvil? by Unknown. Edited slightly by  Daniel Case  prior to upload
Public domain · digitally restored by ComicBooks.com
Nast & the Birth of the Political Cartoon

Was It Not a Rum Disaster, After All, at Spuyten Duyvil?

Unknown. Edited slightly by Daniel Case prior to upload · February 4, 1882

Three anthropomorphized liquor bottles—labeled Whiskey, Rum, and Gin—cavort inside what appears to be a railway car, arms flailing, one yanking what reads as a signal cord overhead. The caption punches a double meaning: rum as the spirit plainly displayed, and rum in its Victorian slang sense of strange or bad. Nast is arguing that the January 1882 Spuyten Duyvil wreck—which killed a dozen passengers—was caused not by mechanical failure but by drunken politicians pulling the emergency brake as a prank, triggering the rear collision. The bottles substitute for the actual officeholders, letting Nast indict a class of men without libel. Signed lower center by Nast.

About this artifact

Creator
Unknown. Edited slightly by Daniel Case prior to upload
Date
February 4, 1882
Rights
Public domain — free to view, share, and reuse.
Restoration
Digitally restored and hosted by ComicBooks.com.

Part of our mission to preserve and restore the public-domain heritage of the medium.