Judge, 1931-02-14 · page 14 of 36
Judge — February 14, 1931 — page 14: what you’re looking at
A restored page from Judge, 1931-02-14. Page through the whole issue in the reader above.
📄 Transcribed text from this page (OCR, searchable)
Machine-transcribed from the original scan — historical spelling and the odd misread are preserved.
Morr Sex Equatity “Strategy and management in secur- ing an eligible matrimonial partner is not the exclusive privilege of the man, and the game law of the state provides no closed season against the kind of ‘trapping’ of which the ap- pellant complains.”—Main v. Main (Ja, 1915), 1 “A loaf of bread of itself is not dangerous.” —Free- JUDGE Tete Eart Carnot “A person, if so inclined, may dress himself in nothing more substantial than the innocence of Eden.” — State v. Martin (1904), 125 Ta. 718. Svcu Ervoition! man v, Shults Bread Co. (1917) 163 N. ¥ Expert Opinion Not Necessary “One who has drunk a considerable quantity of a liquor does not have to be an expert in order to form a reasonably trustworthy opinion as to whether it is intoxicating or not. There is some- thing presageful about a drink of intoxicating liq- uor. The less expert the taker of the drink—the more accurate his opinion is likely to be.”—Wilcozr v. State (1911), 8 Ga. App. 536. Socks, Socks, Socks! “No one could be misled into the be- lief that holes wi not appear in com- plainant’s socks if they are worn long enough, and it is difficult to conceive that anyone would be fatuous enough to suppose that by the use of the word ‘Hole- Proof’ he could deceive people by inducing a belief that the goods would never wear out.” — Hole proof Hosiery Co. v. Wallach Bros.(1909), 172 Fed. 859. NOBLE DECISIONS 12 comicbooks:com